CO129-066 - Public Offices - 1857 — Page 408

407

their own

former judgment. was contrary to the

to the right

Ordinanc

understanding of the Ordin

M. Indron is, doubtless, aggrieved: but, on the

first place,

no reason and

to authority has been

adduced to prove to M.

Labconchere that such in

The case, and, in the next-

place, wen had this

been shown, the Secreting of State has not the

power to adress grievances

Drich individual,

mag suffer

from

grroneous decisions of the regular legal tribunals,

But if

4.

if M.

Hudson's complaint is

2187

to be taken as applying Mr.

to the conduct of the legal authorities but of the

Local Government, then

it must be lathen as

amounting & this. That

Ele Governor did hein sijustice in causing

allowing the Survegor

Au

4

put the law in action

against him once more